Customer data: the under-used lever in portfolio value creation

12 June 2026·5 min read
James Alexander
James AlexanderFounder and CEO

James is Loop Horizon's founder. Prior to Loop, he created and led the Decisioning Transformation Programme at Sky.

Pricing, procurement and leadership are well-worn levers. The one most value-creation plans miss sits in the portfolio company's own customer base.

The lever that isn't on the list

Most value-creation plans pull a familiar set of levers: pricing, procurement, salesforce effectiveness, leadership upgrades, add-on M&A. Customer data rarely makes the list, not because the value isn't there, but because it sits awkwardly between functions. It's partly a technology question, partly a data question, partly a marketing question, and in most portfolio companies those three teams have different priorities, different language and different definitions of success. The capability exists in fragments; the value stays locked.

Why the economics are unusually attractive

Owned-channel revenue (email, app, on-site personalisation, triggered communications) carries 80-90% marginal gross margin. There is no media cost and no incremental cost of goods worth speaking of, so incremental revenue from activating customer data converts to EBITDA at close to 1:1. Few operational levers offer that conversion rate, and fewer still compound: every improvement to the data foundation raises the ceiling on what the next activation can deliver.

Capability and Activation

The mistake most programmes make is treating these as sequential, two years of platform build, then activation. The build consumes the hold period and the value arrives after exit, if at all. The alternative is to run both in parallel: build capability (single customer view, identity, propensity models, platform integration) while activating against whatever exists today (segmented campaigns, triggered communications, audience expansion in paid media). Activation funds and justifies the build; the build raises the ceiling for activation.

What a hold period can look like

A global attractions operator we worked with followed exactly this pattern. In the first half-year, an initial single customer view and propensity models supported drive-time audience expansion and triggered SMS, worth roughly £2m of incremental annual revenue. Each subsequent half-year added capability (digital identity, attribution, enhanced segmentation) and converted it into new activation (web-intent triggers, personalised upsell, retention journeys). By the end of year two the programme was delivering more than £20m of ongoing annual return, compounding, owned-channel revenue converting to EBITDA at the margins described above.

Three questions for diligence or the first 100 days

  • How much of the customer base is reachable, technically and legitimately, in each owned channel? Consent, contact data quality and platform availability set the ceiling on everything else.
  • What does the business know about its customers that it doesn't act on? Most companies hold far more intelligence than they activate; the gap is the opportunity.
  • Where is value already proven but not scaled? A pilot that worked once and stalled is the fastest route to in-year EBITDA.

None of these requires a multi-year platform programme to answer. A focused assessment in weeks gives a value-creation plan its customer-data chapter, sequenced for a hold period, with in-year returns funding the longer build.

We help investors and portfolio companies quantify and capture this lever, from diligence support to embedded delivery. Start a conversation.

← Back to all insights